EFH at Intelligence Squared 2020 New York with Bill Nye
Let’s restore critical thinking, facts, reason, and civility to American public discourse. Join the debate and hear both sides of every issue.
Let’s restore critical thinking, facts, reason, and civility to American public discourse. Join the debate and hear both sides of every issue.
A row has erupted between scientists and academics over claims by Stanford Professor Mark Jacobson that it would be possible to power the United States entirely with wind, water and solar power.
Video: EFH Director, Kirsty Gogan asked Energy & Climate Minister for his view on advanced nuclear. His answer may surprise you.
The idea we might need nuclear power to save the environment may have seen farfetched thirty years ago, at the height of the anti-nuclear movement. But it’s an idea that more and more scientists, energy experts and even environmentalists share.
Sixty six eminent conservation scientists have signed an open letter entreating the environmental community to support evidence-based energy policy, rather than simply relying on idealistic perceptions of what is ‘green’.
The solution to climate change is still seen by most environmental activists and leaders as hinging primarily on a huge …
Some of the Green movement’s most prominent leaders argue that nuclear is both aligned with environmental values and absolutely essential to achieving the movement’s goals.
Nothing about being pro-nuclear need diminish your support for wind and solar and energy efficiency. Those are all vital elements of any fully effective way forward.
According to the world’s leading climate scientists: “In the real world there is no credible path to climate stabilization that does not include a substantial role for nuclear power.”